The time paradox in perception
Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 6 (6):145-149 (1909)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. T. Fraser (1987). Time, the Familiar Stranger. University of Massachusetts Press.
W. A. Suchting (1969). Perception and the Time-Gap Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 19 (January):46-56.
Emilio Gonzalez-Diaz (2004). Paradox, Time, and de-Paradoxication in Luhmann: No Easy Way Out. World Futures 60 (1 & 2):15 – 27.
Susan Rogerson (2007). Natural Deduction and Curry's Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):155 - 179.
Robin le Poidevin (2004). A Puzzle Concerning Time Perception. Synthese 142 (1):109-142.
Storrs McCall & E. J. Lowe (2003). D/4D Equivalence, the Twins Paradox and Absolute Time. Analysis 63 (278):114-123.
Laureano Luna (2010). Ungrounded Causal Chains and Beginningless Time. Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (3-4):297-307.
Michel Treisman (1999). The Perception of Time: Philosophical Views and Psychological Evidence. In The Arguments of Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bradley Dowden, Time. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #84,198 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
