David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 40 (1):131-146 (2009)
Abstract: Michael Walzer and David Miller defend the authority of democratic states to determine who will be allowed entry and membership. In support of this view they have claimed that the domestic solidarity necessary for social justice is threatened by the unregulated influx of outsiders. This empirical thesis proves to be false when applied to the United States, where heavy Latino and Latina immigration is more likely to increase civic solidarity than to diminish it. Seen in this light, the positions of Jürgen Habermas and Carol Gould, giving human rights priority over democratic sovereignty in decisions about membership, cannot be criticized as utopian. Liberal philosophers can also defend open borders as a way to give oppressed peoples representation inside powerful countries where state decisions often threaten access to essential resources and basic freedoms in their home countries.
|Keywords||nationalism immigration race human rights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Will Kymlicka (2001). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
David Miller (2001). On Nationality. Mind 110 (438):512-516.
Norman Daniels (1985). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 94 (1):142-148.
Carol C. Gould (2004). Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Raphael J. Nawrotzki (2014). Climate Migration and Moral Responsibility. Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (1):69-87.
Similar books and articles
Joseph Wronka (1994). Human Rights and Social Policy in the United States: An Educational Agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Moral Education 23 (3):261-272.
Arash Abizadeh (2010). Closed Borders, Human Rights, and Democratic Legitimation. In David Hollenbach (ed.), Driven From Home: Human Rights and the New Realities of Forced Migration. Georgetown University Press
Shelley Wilcox (2009). The Open Borders Debate on Immigration. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):813-821.
Mathias Risse (2012). On Global Justice. Princeton University Press.
Sune Lægaard (2010). What is the Right to Exclude Immigrants? Res Publica 16 (3):245-262.
Matthew J. Lister (2007). A Rawlsian Argument for Extending Family-Based Immigration Benefits to Same-Sex Couples. University of Memphis Law Review 37 (Summer):763-764.
David Miller (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford University Press.
Eva Erman (2006). Rethinking Accountability in the Context of Human Rights. Res Publica 12 (3):249-275.
Joseph H. Carens (2008). The Rights of Irregular Migrants. Ethics and International Affairs 22 (2):163–186.
John Exdell (2007). 5. Immigration, Race, and Liberal Nationalism. Radical Philosophy Today 2007:95-110.
Added to index2009-02-19
Total downloads122 ( #33,833 of 1,937,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #70,613 of 1,937,442 )
How can I increase my downloads?