Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (4):329 - 354 (1988)
|Abstract||We consider the issue of what an agent or a processor needs to know in order to know that its messages are true. This may be viewed as a first step to a general theory of cooperative communication in distributed systems. An honest message is one that is known to be true when it is sent (or said). If every message that is sent is honest, then of course every message that is sent is true. Various weaker considerations than honesty are investigated with the property that provided every message sent satisfies the condition, then every message sent is true.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Codruţa Porcar (2011). Sign and Meaning: A Semiotic Approach to Communication. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (1):20-29.
David Harrah (1985). A Logic of Message and Reply. Synthese 63 (3):275 - 294.
David Harrah (1984). A Logic of Message and Reply. Synthese 58 (2):275 - 294.
Seow Ting Lee (2011). Understanding Truth in Health Communication. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (4):263-282.
David Harrah (1963). A Model for Applying Information and Utility Functions. Philosophy of Science 30 (3):267-273.
David Harrah (1960). The Adequacy of Language. Inquiry 3 (1-4):73 – 88.
Rohit Parikh & Ramaswamy Ramanujam (2003). A Knowledge Based Semantics of Messages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (4):453-467.
Michael A. Gilbert (2002). Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation. Argumentation 16 (1):21-32.
Thomas Li-Ping Tang (2012). Detecting Honest People's Lies in Handwriting. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (4):389-400.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #202,107 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?