David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (4):329 - 354 (1988)
We consider the issue of what an agent or a processor needs to know in order to know that its messages are true. This may be viewed as a first step to a general theory of cooperative communication in distributed systems. An honest message is one that is known to be true when it is sent (or said). If every message that is sent is honest, then of course every message that is sent is true. Various weaker considerations than honesty are investigated with the property that provided every message sent satisfies the condition, then every message sent is true
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Saul A. Kripke (1975). Outline of a Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Citations of this work BETA
James Delgrande & Jérôme Lang (2015). Guest Editors’ Introduction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (2):111-115.
Similar books and articles
Codruţa Porcar (2011). Sign and Meaning: A Semiotic Approach to Communication. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (1):20-29.
David Harrah (1985). A Logic of Message and Reply. Synthese 63 (3):275 - 294.
David Harrah (1984). A Logic of Message and Reply. Synthese 58 (2):275 - 294.
Seow Ting Lee (2011). Understanding Truth in Health Communication. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (4):263-282.
David Harrah (1963). A Model for Applying Information and Utility Functions. Philosophy of Science 30 (3):267-273.
David Harrah (1960). The Adequacy of Language. Inquiry 3 (1-4):73 – 88.
Rohit Parikh & Ramaswamy Ramanujam (2003). A Knowledge Based Semantics of Messages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (4):453-467.
Michael A. Gilbert (2002). Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation. [REVIEW] Argumentation 16 (1):21-32.
Thomas Li-Ping Tang (2012). Detecting Honest People's Lies in Handwriting. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (4):389-400.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #280,340 of 1,793,092 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,508 of 1,793,092 )
How can I increase my downloads?