Must Complex Systems Theory Be Materialistic?

Foundations of Science 17 (1):1-3 (2012)
Abstract
So far, the sciences of complexity have received less attention from philosophers than from scientists. Responding to Salthe’s (Found Sci 15, 4(6):357–367, 2010a ) model of evolution, I focus on its metaphysical implications, asking whether the implications of his canonical developmental trajectory (CDT) must be materialistic as his reading proposes
Keywords Causation  Complex systems  Emergence  Evolution  Materialism  Reduction
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,817
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Gertrudis van de Vijver (2012). Friends of Wisdom? Foundations of Science 17 (1):5-7.
Similar books and articles
James Ladyman, James Lambert & Karoline Wiesner (2013). What is a Complex System? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (1):33-67.
Alexander Laszlo (2009). The Nature of Evolution. World Futures 65 (3):204 – 221.
Meinard Kuhlmann (2011). Mechanisms in Dynamically Complex Systems. In Phyllis McKay Illari & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-03-13

Total downloads

22 ( #81,732 of 1,099,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #90,276 of 1,099,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.