Philosophy 80 (4):543-563 (2005)
|Abstract||The author argues that faith survives as a rational option, despite science rendering improbable distinctively theological claims about the world and history. After rejecting justifications of faith from natural theology and natural law, he defends a seemingly weaker strategy, a corrected version of Pascal's wager argument. The wager lets one's desires count toward showing one's faith to be rational, and the faith requires that oneÕs desires undergo radical transformation to protect the faith, making the wager argument really quite strong. As Nietzsche insisted, to be an atheist in the face of this challenge, one would have to become superhuman and transform one's values radically in the opposite direction.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Greg Janzen (2011). Pascal's Wager and the Nature of God. Sophia 50 (3):331-344.
Elizabeth Burns (2011). What Happens After Pascal's Wager: Living Faith and Rational Belief – Daniel Garber. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):218-220.
Ed L. Miller (1970). Classical Statements on Faith and Reason. New York,Random House.
Alan Hájek, Pascal's Wager. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Donald A. Crosby (2011). Faith and Reason: Their Roles in Religious and Secular Life. State University of New York Press.
Graham Oppy (1991). On Rescher on Pascal's Wager. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (3):159 - 168.
James Franklin (1998). Two Caricatures, I: Pascal's Wager. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (2):109 - 114.
J. L. Schellenberg (2009). The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion. Cornell University Press.
Steve Petersen (2006). Construing Faith as Action Won't Save Pascal's Wager. Philo 9 (2):221-229.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #51,617 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?