David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):403-435 (2005)
: I argue that Condillac was committed to four mutually inconsistent propositions: that the mind is unextended, that sensations are modifications of the mind, that colours are sensations, and that colours are extended. I argue that this inconsistency was not just the blunder of a second-rate philosopher, but the consequence of a deep-seated tension in the views of early modern philosophers on the nature of the mind, sensation, and secondary qualities and that more widely studied figures, notably Condillac's contemporaries, Hume and Reid, were not ultimately any more successful at developing an account of vision that unproblematically avoids the paradox. In passing, I take issue with Nicholas Pastore's account of how Condillac's Treatise on Sensations deals with the visual perception of form (in A Selective History of Theories of Visual Perception)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sacha Golob (2014). Kant on Intentionality, Magnitude, and the Unity of Perception. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):505-528.
Similar books and articles
Todd Buras (2005). The Nature of Sensations in Reid. History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (3):221 - 238.
Nicholas Pastore (1967). Condillac's Phenomenological Rejection of Locke and Berkeley. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (3):429-431.
Hans Aarsleff (2011). Pufendorf and Condillac on Law and Language. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):308-321.
Lorne Falkenstein, Étienne Bonnot de Condillac. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jacques Derrida (1980). The Archeology of the Frivolous: Reading Condillac. University of Nebraska Press.
Jean-Claude Pariente (1999). La Construction de la Sensation Dans l' Essai. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 1 (March 1999):3-26.
Giovanni B. Grandi (2008). Reid and Condillac on Sensation and Perception. Southwest Philosophy Review 24 (1):191-200.
Etienne Bonnot de Condillac (2001). Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Nicholas Pastore (1971). Selective History Of Theories Of Visual Perception, 1650-1950. Oxford University Press.
Etienne Bonnot de Condillac (1930). Condillac's Treatise on the Sensations. London, the Favil Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #96,187 of 1,902,050 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #205,572 of 1,902,050 )
How can I increase my downloads?