Reply to "What Is the Goal of Proof?" by Aaron Lercher

Logique Et Analyse 45 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,656

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Human Right to a Green Future. [REVIEW]Aaron Lercher - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (4):441-442.
Goal-directed proof theory.Dov M. Gabbay - 2000 - Boston: Kluwer Academic. Edited by Nicola Olivetti.
Reply to Beaney.Aaron Preston - 2006 - The Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly 132.
Are There Any Environmental Rights?Aaron Lercher - 2007 - Environmental Values 16 (3):355 - 368.
Causality and sufficiency: Reply to Beauchamp.Fred I. Dretske & Aaron Snyder - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (2):288-291.
Goal Directedness and Future-Focused Accounts of Well-Being.Aaron Wilson - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Don Fallis
Northeastern University

Citations of this work

Mathematical instrumentalism, Gödel’s theorem, and inductive evidence.Alexander Paseau - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):140-149.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references