Uniqueness and historical laws

Philosophy of Science 47 (2):260-276 (1980)
This paper presents an argument for the claim that historical events are unique in a nontrivial sense which entails the inapplicability of the Hempelian D-N model to historical explanations. Some previous criticisms of Hempel are shown to be general criticisms of the D-N model which can be outflanked in cases where a reduction to fundamental laws is available. I then survey grounds for denying that explanations by reasons can be effectively reduced to causal explanations, and for rejecting methodological individualism. I conclude with some positive remarks concerning the structure of historical explanations and sense in which historical events are unique.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/288932
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Aviezer Tucker (1993). A Theory of Historiography as a Pre-Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (4):633-667.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

91 ( #51,755 of 1,902,527 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #268,990 of 1,902,527 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.