David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (5):301-313 (2011)
The family is the exemplar community of Chinese society. This essay explores how Chinese communitarian norms, expressed in thick commitments to the authority and autonomy of the family, are central to contemporary Chinese bioethics. In particular, it focuses on the issue of surrogate decision making to illustrate the Confucian family-grounded communitarian bioethics. The essay first describes the way in which the family, in Chinese bioethics, functions as a whole to provide consent for significant medical and surgical interventions when a patient has lost decision-making capacity. It is argued that the practice of not having an established order for surrogate decision makers (e.g., spouse, children, and then parents), as it is done in the United States, reflects the acknowledgment that the family as a social reality cannot be reduced to a stereotype of the appropriate order of default decision makers. This description of the family as being in authority to make surrogate decisions for an incompetent family member is enriched by an elaboration of the differences among the concepts of patient autonomy, family autonomy, and moral autonomy. The Chinese model, as well as the Confucian communitarian life of families, engages a family autonomy that is supported by a Confucian understanding of moral autonomy, rather than individual autonomy. Finally, the issue of possible conflicts between patient and family interests in relation to a patient’s past wishes in the Chinese model is addressed in light of the role of the physician
|Keywords||Bioethics Communitarianism Confucianism Family Surrogate decision making|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Chan (2002). Moral Autonomy, Civil Liberties, and Confucianism. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):281-310.
Mark J. Cherry & H. Tristram Engelhardt (2004). Informed Consent in Texas: Theory and Practice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):237 – 252.
Amitai Etzioni (1998). [Book Review] the New Golden Rule, Community and Morality in a Democratic Society. [REVIEW] Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):347-353.
Yali Cong (2004). Doctor-Family-Patient Relationship: The Chinese Paradigm of Informed Consent. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):149 – 178.
Ruiping Fan & Julia Tao (2004). Consent to Medical Treatment: The Complex Interplay of Patients, Families, and Physicians. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):139 – 148.
Citations of this work BETA
Roland Kipke (2015). Die Ärztlich Assistierte Selbsttötung Und Das Gesellschaftlich Gute - Physician-Assisted Suicide and the Common Good. Ethik in der Medizin 27 (2):141-154.
Similar books and articles
Ruiping Fan (2002). Reconsidering Surrogate Decision Making: Aristotelianism and Confucianism on Ideal Human Relations. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):346-372.
Erika Yu & Ruiping Fan (2007). A Confucian View of Personhood and Bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):171-179.
Rosamond Rhodes & Ian Holzman (2004). The Not Unreasonable Standard for Assessment of Surrogates and Surrogate Decisions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):367-386.
Kristine Bærøe (2010). Patient Autonomy, Assessment of Competence and Surrogate Decision-Making: A Call for Reasonableness in Deciding for Others. Bioethics 24 (2):87-95.
Mats Johansson & Linus Broström (2008). Turning Failures Into Successes: A Methodological Shortcoming in Empirical Research on Surrogate Accuracy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):17-26.
Mats Johansson & Linus Broström (2011). Counterfactual Reasoning in Surrogate Decision Making – Another Look. Bioethics 25 (5):244-249.
Dallas M. High & Howard B. Turner (1987). Surrogate Decision-Making: The Elderly's Familial Expectations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Elysa R. Koppelman (2002). Dementia and Dignity: Towards a New Method of Surrogate Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):65 – 85.
Richard A. Wright (1991). Clinical Judgment and Bioethics: The Decision Making Link. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):71-91.
Greg Clarke, Robert T. Hall & Greg Rosencrance (2004). Physician-Patient Relations: No More Models. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):16 – 19.
Jessica Berg (2012). Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):28-33.
Kristine Baerøe (2010). Patient Autonomy, Assessment of Competence and Surrogate Decision-Making: A Call for Reasonableness in Deciding for Others. Bioethics 24 (2):87-95.
X. Chen & R. Fan (2010). The Family and Harmonious Medical Decision Making: Cherishing an Appropriate Confucian Moral Balance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):573-586.
Allen E. Buchanan (1989). Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decisionmaking. Cambridge University Press.
Thaddeus Mason Pope (2012). Facebook Can Improve Surrogate Decision Making. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):43-45.
Added to index2012-08-28
Total downloads13 ( #253,855 of 1,789,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #104,901 of 1,789,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?