Which care? Whose responsibility? And why family? A confucian account of long-term care for the elderly
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):495 – 517 (2007)
Across the world, socio-economic forces are shifting the locus of long-term care from the family to institutional settings, producing significant moral, not just financial costs. This essay explores these costs and the distortions in the role of the family they involve. These reflections offer grounds for critically questioning the extent to which moral concerns regarding long-term care in Hong Kong and in mainland China are the same as those voiced in the United States, although family resemblances surely exist. Chinese moral values such as virtue and filial piety embedded in a Confucian moral and social context cannot be recast without distortion in terms of modern Western European notions. The essay concludes that the Confucian resources must be taken seriously in order to develop an authentic Chinese bioethics of long-term care and a defensible approach to long-term care policy for contemporary society in general and Chinese society in particular.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
H. T. Engelhardt (2009). Moral Pluralism, the Crisis of Secular Bioethics, and the Divisive Character of Christian Bioethics: Taking the Culture Wars Seriously. Christian Bioethics 15 (3):234-253.
H. T. Engelhardt (2011). Confronting Moral Pluralism in Posttraditional Western Societies: Bioethics Critically Reassessed. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):243-260.
H. T. Engelhardt (2010). Beyond the Best Interests of Children: Four Views of the Family and of Foundational Disagreements Regarding Pediatric Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):499-517.
Similar books and articles
Ruiping Fan (2006). Confucian Filial Piety and Long Term Care for Aged Parents. HEC Forum 18 (1):1-17.
Mark G. Kuczewski (1999). Ethics in Long-Term Care: Are the Principles Different? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):15-29.
X. Chen & R. Fan (2010). The Family and Harmonious Medical Decision Making: Cherishing an Appropriate Confucian Moral Balance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):573-586.
George J. Agich (1993). Autonomy and Long-Term Care. Oxford University Press.
Y. Cao, X. Chen & R. Fan (2011). Toward a Confucian Family-Oriented Health Care System for the Future of China. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):452-465.
Ruiping Fan (2002). Reconstructionist Confucianism and Health Care: An Asian Moral Account of Health Care Resource Allocation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):675 – 682.
Julia Tao Lai Po Wah (2007). Dignity in Long-Term Care for Older Persons: A Confucian Perspective. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):465 – 481.
Ho Mun Chan & Sam Pang (2007). Long-Term Care: Dignity, Autonomy, Family Integrity, and Social Sustainability: The Hong Kong Experience. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):401 – 424.
H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr (2007). Long-Term Care: The Family, Post-Modernity, and Conflicting Moral Life-Worlds. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):519 – 536.
Xiaomei Zhai & Ren Zong Qiu (2007). Perceptions of Long-Term Care, Autonomy, and Dignity, by Residents, Family and Caregivers: The Beijing Experience. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):425 – 445.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #55,662 of 1,096,609 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #71,259 of 1,096,609 )
How can I increase my downloads?