Bioethics 24 (8):384-394 (2010)
|Abstract||Where does the aspiration to retard human ageing fit in the ‘big picture’ of medical necessities and the requirements of just healthcare? Is there a duty to retard human ageing? And if so, how much should we invest in the basic science that studies the biology of ageing and could lead to interventions that modify the biological processes of human ageing? I consider two prominent accounts of equality and just healthcare – Norman Daniels's application of the principle of fair equality of opportunity and Ronald Dworkin's account of equality of resources – and conclude that, once suitably amended and revised, both actually support the conclusion that anti-ageing research is important and could lead to interventions that ought to be considered ‘medical necessities’|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Colin Farrelly (2008). Aging Research: Priorities and Aggregation. Public Health Ethics 1 (3):258-267.
Chandran Kukathas (2002). Equality and Diversity. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):185-212.
J. Williamson (1981). The Social Challenge of Ageing. Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (2):102-102.
Marianne Talbot (2012). Bioethics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Bavidge (2006). Ageing and Human Nature. In Julian C. Hughes, Stephen J. Louw & Steven R. Sabat (eds.), Dementia: Mind, Meaning, and the Person. Oxford University Press.
Bennett Foddy (2012). The Right and Wrong of Growing Old: Assessing the Argument From Evolution. Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):547-560.
Added to index2009-02-17
Total downloads21 ( #58,789 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?