Myths and legends: An examination of the historical role of the accused in traditional legal scholarship; a look at the 19th century
|Abstract||This article explores and questions traditional legal scholarship's historical presentation of the role of the accused and the relationship between the individual and the state in English criminal justice that it expresses. This perceived relationship between the individual and the state is traced through a textual and historical analysis of rules relating to questioning and to confessions. The article focuses on the 'development' of these rules during the 19th century when the foundations of the modern English legal system were laid. The author maintains that through the conceptual categories of 'subject', 'citizen' and 'suspect', established legal writers have constructed the role played by the accused within an historical framework of 'progress'. Yet when examined in the light of case law and statute from the period, that framework appears more mythical than factual as it lacks the evidential foundation to support it.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Dick W. P. Ruiter (1998). Structuring Legal Institutions. Law and Philosophy 17 (3):215 - 232.
P. W. (1998). Structuring Legal Institutions. Law and Philosophy 17 (3):215-232.
Jean D'Aspremont & Frédéric Dopagne, Two Constitutionalisms in Europe: Pursuing an Articulation of the European and International Legal Orders.
Mirko Bagaric (2010). The Right to an Impartial Hearing Trumps the Social Imperative of Bringing Accused to Trial Even 'Down Under'. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):321-339.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #275,053 of 549,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?