Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Martha J. Farah (1994). Perception and Awareness After Brain Damage. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 4:252-55.
Similar books and articles
We argue that Graziano and Kastner are mistaken to claim that neglect favors their self-directed social perception account of consciousness. For the latter should not predict that neglect would result from damage to mechanisms of social perception. Neglect is better explained in terms of damage to attentional mechanisms.
Pessoa et al. fail to make a clear distinction between visual perception and subjective visual awareness. Their most controversial claims, however, concern subjective visual awareness rather than visual perception: visual awareness is externalized to the “personal level,” thus denying the view that consciousness is a natural biological phenomenon somehow constructed inside the brain.
Discussion of Martha J. Farah, Perception and awareness after brain damage
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

