Patriarchy and Historical Materialism
Hypatia 26 (1):1-21 (2011)
| Abstract | Why does the world have the pattern of patriarchy it currently possesses? Why have patriarchal practices and institutions evolved and changed in the ways they have tended to over time in human societies? This paper explores these general questions by integrating a feminist analysis of patriarchy with the central insights of the functionalist interpretation of historical materialism advanced by G. A. Cohen. The paper has two central aspirations: first, to help narrow the divide between analytical Marxism and feminism by redressing the former's neglect of the important role female labor has played, and continues to play, in shaping human history. Second, by developing the functionalist account of historical materialism in order to take patriarchy seriously, we can derive useful insights for diagnosing the emancipatory challenges that women face in the world today. The degree and form of patriarchy present in any particular society is determined by the productive forces it has had at its disposal. According to historical materialism, technological, material, and medical advances that ease the pressures on high fertility rates (such as the sanitation revolution, vaccinations, birth control, and so on) are the real driving forces behind the positive modulations to patriarchy witnessed in the twentieth century | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesColin Farrelly (2005). Historical Materialism and Supervenience. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):420-446.
Hana Havelková (1993). "Patriarchy" in Czech Society. Hypatia 8 (4):89 - 96.
Robin Fox (1999). Defending the Young: Female Aggression, Resources, Dominance, and the Emptiness of Patriarchy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):224-225.
Charles W. Mills (1989). Is It Immaterial That There's a 'Material' in 'Historical Materialism'? Inquiry 32 (3):323 – 342.
Anna G. Jónasdóttir (1991). Love Power and Political Interests: Towards a Theory of Patriarchy in Contemporary Western Societies. University of Örebro.
Assen Ignatow (1984). Das Geschichtliche in Marxistischer Sicht. Studies in East European Thought 27 (2).
Joel Dickman (1990). Two Qualms About Functionalist Marxism. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):631-643.
Daniel Little (1986). Historical Materialism and Capital. Topoi 5 (2):187-196.
Gillian Howie (2010). Between Feminism and Materialism: A Question of Method. Palgrave Macmillan.
David M. Buss & Joshua Duntley (1999). The Evolutionary Psychology of Patriarchy: Women Are Not Passive Pawns in Men's Game. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):219-220.
Marion Smiley (2004). Democratic Citizenship V. Patriarchy: A Feminist Perspective on Rawls. Fordham Law Review (5):1599-1627.
Amy E. Wendling (2007). Rough, Foul-Mouthed Boys. Radical Philosophy Today 2007:49-67.
Cornelius Castoriadis (1971). History and Revolution: A Revolutionary Critique of Historical Materialism. Bromley(C/o 53a Westmoreland Rd, Bromley, Kent), Solidarity.
Joseph Fracchia (2005). Beyond the Human-Nature Debate: Human Corporeal Organisation as the 'First Fact' of Historical Materialism. Historical Materialism 13 (1):33-62.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-11-16Total downloads19 ( #64,338 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,069 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
