Three ends of the absolute: Schelling on inhibition, hölderlin on separation, and Novalis on density
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):60-85 (2002)
"Three Ends of the Absolute" discusses (1) Schelling's notion of inhibition in the philosophy of nature, (2) Hölderlin's notion of separation in his "Seyn, Urtheil, Modalität," and (3) Novalis' notion of the density of God in his late scientific notes. All three thinkers can be contrasted with Hegel on the basis of their attacks on philosophical absolutes. Schelling (1775-1854), in his First Projection of a Philosophy of Nature (1799), reflects on the conundrum of absolute inhibition in nature, an inhibition of absolute freedom that is necessary if there is to be a procession of natural products. Inhibition conditions all putative absolutes. Hölderlin (1770-1843) argues that absolute separation is essential to consciousness of any kind. Whereas he advances no "doctrine" of the end of the absolute as such, he does emphasize the tragic separation and dissolution to which all intellectual intuition comes. The absolute "original" suffers from an irremediable "debility." Novalis (Friedrich von Hardenberg, 1772-1801), in his Universal Sketchbook, continues the work of his early Fichte Studies by resisting the notion of the absolute ego. "Everything pure is . . . a deception." For Novalis, the absolute can only be our absolute inability to think or act in conformity with an absolute. The article ends with a reflection on Goethe's opposition between "relative" and "absolute" death.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Rynasiewicz (2000). On the Distinction Between Absolute and Relative Motion. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):70-93.
Alison Stone (2008). Being, Knowledge, and Nature in Novalis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):141-163.
Howard Mounce (2011). Winch and Anscombe on Ethics and Religion. Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):241-248.
Vanessa Rumble (2008). "In the Face of All the Glad, Hay-Making Suns": Schelling and Hölderlin on Mourning and Mortality: The Tragic Absolute: German Idealism and the Languishing of God. Research in Phenomenology 38 (1):113-121.
Alison Stone (2011). The Romantic Absolute. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):497-517.
Werner Beierwaltes (2002). The Legacy of Neoplatonism in F. W. J. Schelling's Thought. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (4):393 – 428.
Peter Thielke (2010). Who's Who From Kant to Hegel II: Art and the Absolute. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):398-411.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #94,684 of 1,790,308 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #429,822 of 1,790,308 )
How can I increase my downloads?