David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):609-619 (2003)
This study aimed at evaluating the role of proprioception in the process of matching the final position of one's limbs with an intentional movement. Two experiments were realised with the same paradigm of conscious recognition of one's own limb position from a distorted position. In the first experiment, 22 healthy subjects performed the task in an active and in a passive condition. In the latter condition, proprioception was the only available information since the central signals related to the motor command were likely to be absent. The second experiment was realised with a deafferented patient who suffers from a complete haptic deafferentation, including loss of proprioception. The results first argue in favour of a dominant role of proprioception in action recognition, but they also stress the possible role of central signals. The process of matching the final position of one's limbs with an intended movement and thus of action recognition would be achieved through a comparison process between the predicted sensory consequences of the action, which are stored in its internal model, and the actual sensory consequences of that action.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Glenn Carruthers (2012). The Case for the Comparator Model as an Explanation of the Sense of Agency and its Breakdowns. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):30-45.
Matthis Synofzik, Gottfried Vosgerau & Albert Newen (2009). Reply to Carruthers☆. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (2):521-523.
Glenn Carruthers (2009). Commentary on Synofzik, Vosgerau and Newen. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (2):515 - 520.
Catherine Preston & Roger Newport (2010). Self-Denial and the Role of Intentions in the Attribution of Agency. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):986-998.
Atsushi Sato (2009). Both Motor Prediction and Conceptual Congruency Between Preview and Action-Effect Contribute to Explicit Judgment of Agency. Cognition 110 (1):74-83.
Similar books and articles
P. Canivez (2011). Pathologies of Recognition. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):851-887.
Jing Zhu & Paul Thagard (2002). Emotion and Action. Philosophical Psychology 15 (1):19 – 36.
Thomas Baldwin (2009). Recognition: Personal and Political. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):311-328.
G. Knoblich & R. Flach (2003). Action Identity: Evidence From Self-Recognition, Prediction, and Coordination. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):620-632.
ChristianAlain LazzeriCaillé (2006). Recognition Today - the Theoretical, Ethical and Political Stakes of the Concept. Critical Horizons 7 (1):63-100.
Alfred R. Mele & Paul K. Moser (1994). Intentional Action. Noûs 28 (1):39-68.
Patrick Haggard & S. Clark (2003). Intentional Action: Conscious Experience and Neural Prediction. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):695-707.
Barbara Montero (2006). Proprioceiving Someone Else's Movement. Philosophical Explorations 9 (2):149 – 161.
Ellen Fridland (2011). The Case for Proprioception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):521-540.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #103,904 of 1,696,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #115,452 of 1,696,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?