Why is a dog-behaviour-inspired social robot not a doggy-robot?

Interaction Studies 15 (2):224-232 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

You and I, robot.Shaun Gallagher - 2013 - AI and Society 28 (4):455-460.
There is no 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (expanded & revised).Christopher Grau - 2011 - In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 451.
A study of self-awareness in robots.Toshiyuki Takiguchi, Atsushi Mizunaga & Junichi Takeno - 2013 - International Journal of Machine Consciousness 5 (2):145-164.
Robot Pain.Simon van Rysewyk - 2014 - International Journal of Synthetic Emotions 4 (2):22-33.
Relationalism through Social Robotics.Raya A. Jones - 2013 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (4):405-424.
Robot caregivers: harbingers of expanded freedom for all? [REVIEW]Yvette Pearson - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):277-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-31

Downloads
39 (#397,578)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why is a dog-behaviour-inspired social robot not a doggy-robot?Tamás Faragó, Márta Gácsi, Beáta Korcsok & Ádám Miklósi - 2014 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 15 (2):224-232.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Social behaviours in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model for designing social robots.Tamás Faragó, Ádám Miklósi, Beáta Korcsok, Judit Száraz & Márta Gácsi - 2014 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 15 (2):143-172.
Towards a conceptual and methodological framework for determining robot believability.Robert Rose, Matthias Scheutz & Paul Schermerhorn - 2010 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 11 (2):314-335.
What downgrades a robot from pet to appliance?Vicente Matellán & Camino Fernández - 2014 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 15 (2):210-215.

View all 21 references / Add more references