Philosophical Studies 112 (3):187-208 (2003)
|Abstract||The content of the externalist thesis about the mind depends crucially on how we define the distinction between the internal and the external. According to the usual understanding, the boundary between the internal and the external is the skull or the skin of the subject. In this paper I argue that the usual understanding is inadequate, and that only the new understanding of the external/internal distinction I suggest helps us to understand the issue of the compatibility of externalism and privileged access|
|Keywords||Externalism Internal Metaphysics Mind Privileged Access Mckinsey, M|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael McKinsey (2007). Externalism and Privileged Access Are Inconsistent. In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan D. Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
Andrew Cullison (2007). Privileged Access, Externalism, and Ways of Believing. Philosophical Studies 136 (3):305-318.
Jonathan Ellis (2007). Content Externalism and Phenomenal Character: A New Worry About Privileged Access. Synthese 159 (1):47 - 60.
John Gibbons (2006). Access Externalism. Mind 115 (457):19-39.
Pierre Jacob (2001). Is Self-Knowledge Compatible with Externalism? Mind and Society 2 (1):59-75.
Jessica Brown (1999). Boghossian on Externalism and Privileged Access. Analysis 59 (1):52-59.
Ted A. Warfield (2005). Tyler Burge's Self-Knowledge. Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):169-178.
Finn Spicer (2004). On the Identity of Concepts, and the Compatibility of Externalism and Privileged Access. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (2):155-168.
Paul Noordhof (2004). Outsmarting the McKinsey-Brown Argument? Analysis 64 (1):48-56.
Michael McKinsey (2002). Forms of Externalism and Privileged Access. Philosophical Perspectives 16 (s16):199-224.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads159 ( #2,217 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,273 of 548,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?