Governing Planetary Nanomedicine: Environmental Sustainability and a UNESCO Universal Declaration on the Bioethics and Human Rights of Natural and Artificial Photosynthesis (Global Solar Fuels and Foods)
Nanoethics (Browse Results) (forthcoming)
|Abstract||Abstract Environmental and public health-focused sciences are increasingly characterised as constituting an emerging discipline—planetary medicine. From a governance perspective, the ethical components of that discipline may usefully be viewed as bestowing upon our ailing natural environment the symbolic moral status of a patient. Such components emphasise, for example, the origins and content of professional and social virtues and related ethical principles needed to promote global governance systems and policies that reduce ecological stresses and pathologies derived from human overpopulation, selfishness and greed—such as pollution, loss of biodiversity, deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions, as well as provide necessary energy, water and food security. Less well explored in this context, however, is the ethics that should underpin global use of emerging technologies such as nanotechnology as forms of planetary therapeutics. Nanotechnology may be particularly important, for instance, as a mechanism for improving upon photosynthesis and engineering it into human structures for localised production of carbon-neutral hydrogen based-fuel and carbohydrate-based food and fertilizer. Artificial photosynthesis, because of its unique and widespread public and environmental benefits in this period of human history, may even be termed the moral culmination of nanotechnology, assisting this planet to move beyond the Anthropocene epoch to that of the Sustainocene. This paper explores practical steps towards planetary nanomedicine involving governance of artificial photosynthesis, including a UNESCO Universal Declaration on the Bioethics and Human Rights of Natural and Artificial Photosynthesis (Global Solar Fuels and Foods ). Content Type Journal Article Category Original Paper Pages 1-13 DOI 10.1007/s11569-012-0144-4 Authors Thomas Faunce, College of Medicine, Biology and the Environment and College of Law (joint Appointment), Australian National University, Acton, Australia Journal NanoEthics Online ISSN 1871-4765 Print ISSN 1871-4757|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas Alured Faunce & Hitoshi Nasu (2009). Normative Foundations of Technology Transfer and Transnational Benefit Principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):296-321.
Donald Evans (2012). Commentary on the Unesco Ibc Report on Respect for Vulnerability and Personal Integrity: (Article 8 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights). International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):170-173.
Mary C. Rawlinson (2012). Women and Special Vulnerability: Commentary "On the Principle of Respect for Human Vulnerability and Personal Integrity," UNESCO, International Bioethics Committee Report. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):174-179.
Thomas Alured Faunce (2005). Will International Human Rights Subsume Medical Ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):173-178.
Fabrice Jotterand (2010). Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):45-52.
R. Andorno (2007). Global Bioethics at UNESCO: In Defence of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (3):150-154.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2012). Global Health Justice and Governance. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.
Udo Schuklenk (2010). Defending the Indefensible. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1).
Henk A. M. J. ten Have (2010). Unesco's Activities in Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1).
Mairi Levitt & Hub Zwart (2009). Bioethics: An Export Product? Reflections on Hands-on Involvement in Exploring the “External” Validity of International Bioethical Declarations. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3).
Nermin Gedik (2007). The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36.
Mary Stefanazzi (2013). Is Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Ever Ethically Justified? If so, Under What Circumstances. HEC Forum 25 (1):79-94.
Linda MacDonald Glenn & Jeanann S. Boyce (2008). Nanotechnology: Considering the Complex Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues with the Parameters of Human Performance. Nanoethics 2 (3):265-275.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-04-09
Total downloads1 ( #274,921 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?