Normative Foundations of Technology Transfer and Transnational Benefit Principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):296-321 (2009)
The United Nations Scientific, Education and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) expresses in its title and substance a controversial linkage of two normative systems: international human rights law and bioethics. The UDBHR has the status of what is known as a ‘non-binding’ declaration under public international law. The UDBHR’s normative foundation within bioethics (and association, for example, with virtue-based or principlist bioethical theories) is more problematic. Nonetheless, the UDBHR contains socially important principles of technology transfer and transnational benefit (articles 14, 15 and 21). This paper is one of the first to explore how the disciplines of bioethics and international human rights law may interact in the UDBHR to advance the policy relevance and health impact of technology transfer and transnational benefit principles. It investigates their normative ancestry in the UDBHR, as well as relevant conceptual differences between bioethics and public international law in this respect and how these may be relevant to their conceptual evolution and application.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhp021
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Tom L. Beauchamp (1995). Principlism and Its Alleged Competitors. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (3):181-198.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
H. ten Have (2006). The Activities of UNESCO in the Area of Ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):333-351.
Udo Schuklenk (2010). Defending the Indefensible. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):83-88.
Henk A. M. J. ten Have (2010). Unesco's Activities in Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):7-15.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

6 ( #322,427 of 1,725,477 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #268,753 of 1,725,477 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.