David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind 116 (464):875-902 (2007)
A key debate in the epistemology of testimony concerns when it is reasonable to acquire belief through accepting what a speaker says. This debate has been largely understood as the debate over how much, or little, assessment and monitoring an audience must engage in. When it is understood in this way the debate simply ignores the relationship speaker and audience can have. Interlocutors rarely adopt the detached approach to communication implied by talk of assessment and monitoring. Audiences trust speakers to be truthful and demonstrate certain reactive attitudes if they are not. Trust and the accompanying willingness to these reactive attitudes can then provide speakers with a reason to be trustworthy. So through ignoring interlocutors' engagement with the communicative process, the existing debate misses the possibility that it is an audience's trusting a speaker that makes it reasonable for the audience to accept what the speaker says
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Arnon Keren (2012). On the Alleged Perversity of the Evidential View of Testimony. Analysis 72 (4):700-707.
Thomas W. Simpson (2012). What Is Trust? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (4):550-569.
Benjamin McMyler (2012). Responsibility for Testimonial Belief. Erkenntnis 76 (3):337-352.
Katherine Hawley (2012). Partiality and Prejudice in Trusting. Synthese (9):1-17.
Philip J. Nickel (2012). Trust and Testimony. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):301-316.
Similar books and articles
Arnon Keren (2007). Epistemic Authority, Testimony and the Transmission of Knowledge†. Episteme 4 (3):368-381.
Benjamin McMyler (2007). Knowing at Second Hand. Inquiry 50 (5):511 – 540.
Joel Buenting (2005). Re-Thinking the Duplication of Speaker/Hearer Belief in the Epistemology of Testimony. Episteme: Journal of Social Epistemology 2 (2):43-48.
Petr Kotatko (2000). Mutual Beliefs and Communicative Success. Theoria 15 (3):421-433.
Sheela Pawar (2009). Trusting Others, Trusting God: Concepts of Belief, Faith, and Rationality. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Paul Faulkner (2011). Knowledge on Trust. Oup Oxford.
Richard Moran (2005). Getting Told and Being Believed. Philosophers' Imprint 5 (5):1-29.
Paul Faulkner (2007). What Is Wrong with Lying? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):535-557.
Paul Faulkner (2007). What is Wrong with Lying? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):535–557.
Paul Faulkner (2007). A Genealogy of Trust. Episteme 4 (3):305-321.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #40,342 of 1,696,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #94,197 of 1,696,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?