David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
As the theory of the atom, quantum mechanics is perhaps the most successful theory in the history of science. It enables physicists, chemists, and technicians to calculate and predict the outcome of a vast number of experiments and to create new and advanced technology based on the insight into the behavior of atomic objects. But it is also a theory that challenges our imagination. It seems to violate some fundamental principles of classical physics, principles that eventually have become a part of western common sense since the rise of the modern worldview in the Renaissance. So the aim of any metaphysical interpretation of quantum mechanics is to account for these violations
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeffrey Grupp (2006). Mereological Nihilism: Quantum Atomism and the Impossibility of Material Constitution. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 16 (3):245-386.
Michael Cuffaro (2010). The Kantian Framework of Complementarity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (4):309-317.
Simon Friederich (2011). How to Spell Out the Epistemic Conception of Quantum States. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (3):149-157.
Phillip R. Sloan (2012). How Was Teleology Eliminated in Early Molecular Biology? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (1):140-151.
Stefano Osnaghi, Fábio Freitas & Olival Freire (2009). The Origin of the Everettian Heresy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (2):97-123.
Similar books and articles
Kristian Camilleri (2009). Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation. Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
Nicholas Maxwell (1975). Does the Minimal Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Resolve the Measurement Problem? Methodology and Science 8:84-101.
John G. Cramer (1988). An Overview of the Transactional Interpretation. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 27 (227):1-5.
John T. Bruer (1982). The Classical Limit of Quantum Theory. Synthese 50 (2):167 - 212.
D. N. (2003). Copenhagen Computation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (3):511-522.
Hans Reichenbach (1944/1998). Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Dover Publications.
A. A. Pechenkin (2002). Mandelstam's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics in Comparative Perspective. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):265 – 284.
John G. Cramer (1986). The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 58 (3):647-687.
Holm Tetens (1986). “Ist Die Quantenphysik Vollständig?”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 17 (1):96-118.
Guillaume Adenier (ed.) (2007). Quantum Theory, Reconsideration of Foundations 4: Växjö (Sweden), 11-16 June, 2007. American Institute of Physics.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #24,844 of 1,102,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #61,871 of 1,102,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?