David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Modern cosmology treats space and time, or rather space-time, as concrete particulars. The General Theory of Relativity combines the distribution of matter and energy with the curvature of space-time. Here space-time appears as a concrete entity which affects matter and energy and is affected by the things in it. I question the idea that space-time is a concrete existing entity which both substantivalism and reductive relationism maintain. Instead I propose an alternative view, which may be called non-reductive relationism, by arguing that space and time are abstract entities based on extension and changes.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Forrest (1995). Is Space-Time Discrete or Continuous? — An Empirical Question. Synthese 103 (3):327--354.
Robert Rynasiewicz, Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Emile Borel (1960). Space and Time. New York, Dover Publications.
Emile Borel (1926). Space and Time. London and Glasgow, Blackie & Son Limited.
John D. Norton, What Can We Learn About the Ontology of Space and Time From the Theory of Relativity?
Bede Rundle (2009). Time, Space, and Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads202 ( #4,566 of 1,696,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)26 ( #15,012 of 1,696,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?