David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (1):95-134 (2005)
This paper studies the constellations of attitudes––sentimental, moral, epistemological, and social––that three leading psychologists active in turn-of-the-twentieth-century America took to be essential to the production of scientific knowledge. William James, G. Stanley Hall, and Edward Titchener located the virtues and traits proper to the scientific frame of mind, and combined them into normative images of the man of science, or, ‘scientific personae’ as I use the term here. I argue that their competing formulations of the scientific ethos informed their psychological practice and epistemological commitments. James, Hall, and Titchener mobilized their representations of the man of science in order to reconfigure the field of psychology and redefine its boundaries, as well as to promote forms of sociability and define the proper role of scientists both within the academy and in the wider polity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Susan Lanzoni (2012). Empathy in Translation: Movement and Image in the Psychological Laboratory. Science in Context 25 (3):301-327.
Similar books and articles
A. O. Lovejoy, J. E. Creighton, W. E. Hocking, E. B. McGilvary, W. T. Marvin, G. H. Head & Howard C. Warren (1914). The Case of Professor Mecklin: Report of the Committee of Inquiry of the American Philosophical Association and the American Psychological Association. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 11 (3):67-81.
William O'Donohue (1993). The Spell of Kuhn on Psychology: An Exegetical Elixir. Philosophical Psychology 6 (3):267 – 287.
Douglas N. Walton (1983). Ethics of Withdrawal of Life-Support Systems: Case Studies on Decision-Making in Intensive Care. Greenwood Press.
Edward S. Reed (1986). James J. Gibson's Revolution in Perceptual Psychology: A Case Study of the Transformation of Scientific Ideas. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (1):65-98.
Robert C. Fuller (1986). Americans and the Unconscious. Oxford University Press.
Lindley Darden (1991). Theory Change in Science: Strategies From Mendelian Genetics. Oxford University Press.
James E. Royce (1988). Psychologists and Philosophy: The Birth of Division 24 of the American Psychological Association in 19621. Philosophical Psychology 1 (3):373-379.
B. E. Bondarenko (1977). The Dramatis Personae of the Revolution in Science and Technology. Russian Studies in Philosophy 16 (1):82-87.
Richard M. Burian (2001). The Dilemma of Case Studies Resolved: The Virtues of Using Case Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science 9 (4):383-404.
Gerald James Holton (1978). The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies. Cambridge University Press.
Brian M. Hughes (2011). Psychology Express: Conceptual and Historical Issues in Psychology. Pearson.
George Graham & Terence E. Horgan (1988). How to Be Realistic About Folk Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):69-81.
G. Fletcher (1995). Two Uses of Folk Psychology: Implications for Psychological Science. Philosophical Psychology 8 (3):375-88.
James J. Delaney (2010). Catholicism, the Human Form, and Genetic Engineering. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:75-87.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads1 ( #499,222 of 1,410,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?