Motives and literary criticism

Philosophical Studies 38 (4):403 - 418 (1980)
I argue that it is implausible to think that motives, As distinguished from intentions, Are relevant to literary criticism. The considerations leading to this conclusion offer some insights into the continuing debate over the relevance of artist's intentions to criticism. I also examine briefly why motives are not relevant to aesthetic judgments even though they are (plausibly) relevant to ethical ones. Some views of anscombe on intentions are discussed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,009
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
William Franke (2010). On the Poetic Truth That is Higher Than History. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):415-430.
Martin Paulsen (2008). Literary Critics in a New Era. Studies in East European Thought 60 (3):251 - 260.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

10 ( #165,352 of 1,410,134 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,134 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.