Heidegger and Marcuse : The catastrophe and redemption of technology
In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Andrew Feenberg (2006). Symmetry, Asymmetry, and the Real Possibility of Radical Change: Reply to Kochan. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (4):721-727.
Iain Thomson (2000). What's Wrong with Being a Technological Essentialist? A Response to Feenberg. Inquiry 43 (4):429 – 444.
Andrew Feenberg (1996). Marcuse or Habermas: Two Critiques of Technology. Inquiry 39 (1):45 – 70.
Daniel Dahlstrom (2006). Comments on Andrew Feenberg's Heidegger and Marcuse. Techné 9 (3):52-61.
Laureano Ralon, Interview with Andrew Feenberg. Figure/Ground Communication's Scholarly Interview Series.
Daniel Dahlstrom (2006). Review of Andrew Feenberg, Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (1).
Iain Thomson (2000). From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg. Inquiry 43 (2):203 – 215.
Robert C. Scharff (2007). Andrew Feenberg, Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):91-97.
Jeff Kochan (2006). Feenberg and STS: Counter-Reflections on Bridging the Gap. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (4):702-720.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

