Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (2):493-503 (2012)
|Abstract||This paper places Husserl’s mature work, The Crisis of the European Sciences, in the context of his engagement with – and critique of – experimental psychology at the time. I begin by showing (a) that Husserl accorded psychology a crucial role in his philosophy, i.e., that of providing a scientific analysis of subjectivity, and (b) that he viewed contemporary psychology – due to its naturalism – as having failed to pursue this goal in the appropriate manner. I then provide an analysis of Husserl’s views about naturalism and scientific philosophy. Some central themes of the Crisis are traced back to Husserl’s earlier work and to his relationship with his teacher, Franz Brentano, with whom he disagreed about the status of “inner perception” as the proper scientific method for a phenomenological analysis. The paper then shows that Husserl was well aware of at least one publication about the crisis of psychology (Bühler’s 1927 book), and it teases out some aspects of the complicated relationship between Husserl and members of the Würzburg School of thought psychology: The latter had drawn on Husserl’s writings, but Husserl felt that they had misunderstood his central thesis. I conclude by placing Husserl’s work in the wider context of scientific, cultural, and political crisis-discourses at the time.|
|Keywords||Husserl crisis of European science history of philosophy of the human sciences|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dermot Moran (2012). Husserl's Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Tanja Staehler (2009). J. Dodd: Crisis and Reflection. An Essay on Husserl's Crisis of the European Sciences. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 25 (2):177-183.
Pierre-Jean Renaudie (2010). La psychologie et le « chemin de croix » de la phénoménologie transcendantale. Studia Phaenomenologica 10:163-192.
Jeff Kochan (2011). Husserl and the Phenomenology of Science. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (3):467-471.
Edmund G. Husserl (1937). The Way Into Phenomenological Transcendental Philosophy From Psychology. In The Crisis of European Sciences.
Eva-Maria Engelen (2010). Husserl, History, and Consciousness. In David Hyder & Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.), Science and the Life-World. Stanford University Press.
Edmund Husserl (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston,Northwestern University Press.
Barry Smith (1995). Common Sense. In The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Common Sense (1995). Barry Smith. In Barry Smith & David W. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge University Press.
Patrick A. Heelan (1987). Husserl's Later Philosophy of Natural Science. Philosophy of Science 54 (3):368-390.
Erazim Kohák (1985). Jan Patočka, Edmund Husserl's Philosophy of the Crisis of Science and His Conception of a Phenomenology of the “Life-World”. Husserl Studies 2 (2):129-155.
Kenneth Knies (2011). The Practical Obscurity of Philosophy: Husserl's “ Arbeit der Probleme der Letzten Voraussetzungen ”. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 27 (2):83-104.
Thomas Sturm & Annette Mülberger (2012). Crisis Discussions in Psychology—New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (2):425-433.
Patrick A. Heelan (1997). Why a Hermeneutical Philosophy of the Natural Sciences? Man and World 30 (3):271-298.
Added to index2011-12-10
Total downloads14 ( #90,445 of 722,751 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,751 )
How can I increase my downloads?