David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 39 (1):45 – 70 (1996)
The debate between Marcuse and Habermas over technology marked a significant turning point in the history of the Frankfurt School. After the 1960s Habermas's influence grew as Marcuse's declined and Critical Theory adopted a far less Utopian stance. Recently there has been a revival of quite radical technology criticism in the environmental movement and under the influence of Foucault and constructivism. This article takes a new look at the earlier debate from the standpoint of these recent developments. While much of Habermas's argument remains persuasive, his defense of modernity now seems to concede far too much to the claims of autonomous technology. His essentialist picture of technology as an application of a purely instrumental form of nonsocial rationality is less plausible after a decade of historicizing research in technology studies. The article argues that Marcuse was right after all to claim that technology is socially determined even if he was unable to develop his insight fruitfully. The article derives a new approach to technology criticism from both constructivism and Habermas's communication theory. The essence of technology is shown to be historical and reflexive, like the essence of other social institutions. As such an institution, its rationality is always implemented in value?biased forms subject to political critique
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michel Foucault (1977). Discipline and Punish. Vintage Books.
Herbert Marcuse (1991). One-Dimensional Man. Routledge.
Kwame Anthony Appiah, Charles Taylor, Jürgen Habermas, Stephen C. Rockefeller, Michael Walzer & Susan Wolf (1994). Multiculturalism. Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen (2007). From Human-Centred to Human-Context Centred Approach: Looking Back Over 'the Hills', What has Been Gained and Lost? [REVIEW] AI and Society 21 (4):471-495.
Han van Diest (2008). Possibilities of Democratisation in Organisations. Social Epistemology 22 (1):97 – 117.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Feenberg (2002). Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. Oxford University Press.
Jeff Kochan (2006). Feenberg and STS: Counter-Reflections on Bridging the Gap. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (4):702-720.
David J. Stump (2000). Socially Constructed Technology. Inquiry 43 (2):217 – 224.
Laureano Ralon, Interview with Andrew Feenberg. Figure/Ground Communication's Scholarly Interview Series.
Andrew Feenberg (2004). Heidegger and Marcuse : The Catastrophe and Redemption of Technology. In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge
Norman Stockman (1978). Habermas, Marcuse and the Aufhebung of Science and Technology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (1):15-35.
Andrew Feenberg (2009). Radical Philosophy of Technology. Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):199-217.
Samir Gandesha (2004). Marcuse, Habermas, and the Critique of Technology. In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads86 ( #48,127 of 1,796,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #281,430 of 1,796,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?