Operationism in Psychology - What the Debate is About, What the Debate Should Be About
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for the Histoty of the Behavioral Sciences 41 (2):131-150 (2005)
I offer an analysis of operationism in psychology, which is rooted in an historical study of the investigative practices of two of its early proponents (S. S. Stevens and E. C. Tolman). According to this analysis, early psychological operationists emphasized the importance of experimental operations and called for scientists to specify what kinds of operations were to count as empirical indicators for the referents of their concepts. While such specifications were referred to as “definitions,” I show that such definitions were not taken to constitute a priori knowledge or be analytically true. Rather, they served the pragmatic function of enabling scientists to do research on a purported phenomenon. I argue that historical and philosophical discussions of problems with operationism have conflated it, both conceptually and historically, with positivism, and I raise the question of what are the “real” issues behind the debate about operationism.
|Keywords||operationism operational definitions history and philosophy of psychology epistemology of experimentation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jacqueline Anne Sullivan (2010). Reconsidering 'Spatial Memory' and the Morris Water Maze. Synthese 177 (2):261-283.
Peter Machamer (2011). Phenomena, Data and Theories: A Special Issue of Synthese. Synthese 182 (1):1-5.
Uljana Feest (2011). Remembering (Short-Term) Memory: Oscillations of an Epistemic Thing. Erkenntnis 75 (3):391-411.
Similar books and articles
Emilio Ribes-Iñesta (2003). What Is Defined in Operational Definitions? The Case of Operant Psychology. Behavior and Philosophy 31:111 - 126.
Gary L. Hardcastle (1995). S. S. Stevens and the Origins of Operationism. Philosophy of Science 62 (3):404-424.
Uljana Feest (2010). Concepts as Tools in the Experimental Generation of Knowledge in Cognitive Neuropsychology. Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):173-190.
C. A. Qadir (1961). Methodology of Psychology. Pakistan Philosophical Congress 8:133-144.
S. Brian Hood & Benjamin J. Lovett (2011). Realism and Operationism in Psychiatric Diagnosis. Philosophical Psychology 24 (2):207-222.
R. S. Peters (1951). Observationalism in Psychology. Mind 60 (January):43-61.
Herbert Fingarette (1950). Unconscious Behavior and Allied Concepts: A New Approach to Their Empirical Interpretation. Journal of Philosophy 47 (August):509-519.
R. H. (1955). Operationism. Review of Metaphysics 9 (2):359-359.
Abram Cornelius Benjamin (1955). Operationism. Springfield, Ill.,Thomas.
Raymond J. Nogar (1956). Operationism. New Scholasticism 30 (3):380-382.
A. Cornelius Benjamin (1950). Operationism--A Critical Evaluation. Journal of Philosophy 47 (15):439-444.
Frank E. Hartung (1944). Operationism as a Cultural Survival. Philosophy of Science 11 (4):227-232.
Hornell Hart (1940). Operationism Analysed Operationally. Philosophy of Science 7 (3):288-313.
Fred Wilson (1968). Is Operationism Unjust to Temperature? Synthese 18 (4):394 - 422.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-10-26
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?