Science and experience/science of experience: Gestalt psychology and the anti-metaphysical project of the Aufbau
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 15 (1):1-25 (2007)
: This paper investigates the way in which Rudolf Carnap drew on Gestalt psychological notions when defining the basic elements of his constitutional system. I argue that while Carnap's conceptualization of basic experience was compatible with ideas articulated by members of the Berlin/Frankfurt school of Gestalt psychology, his formal analysis of the relationship between two basic experiences ("recollection of similarity") was not. This is consistent, given that Carnap's aim was to provide a unified reconstruction of scientific knowledge, as opposed to the mental processes by which we gain knowledge about the world. It is this last point that put him in marked contrast to some of the older epistemological literature, which he cited when pointing to the complex character of basic experience. While this literature had the explicit goal of overcoming metaphysical presuppositions by means of an analysis of consciousness, Carnap viewed these attempts as still carrying metaphysical baggage. By choosing the autopsychological basis, he expressed his intellectual depth to their antimetaphysical impetus. By insisting on the metaphysical neutrality of his system, he emphasized that he was carrying out a project in which they had not succeeded.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Rudolf Carnap (1931). Überwindung der Metaphysik Durch Logische Analyse der Sprache. Erkenntnis 2 (1):219-241.
Rudolf Carnap (1931). Die Physikalische Sprache Als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft. Erkenntnis 2 (1):432--65.
Uljana Feest (2007). 'Hypotheses, Everywhere Only Hypotheses!': On Some Contexts of Dilthey's Critique of Explanatory Psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (1):43-62.
T. M. K., Werner Ziegenfuss & Gertrud Jung (1950). Philosophen-Lexicon. Handworterbuch der Philosophie nach Personen. Philosophical Quarterly 1 (1):93.
Martin Kusch, Psychologism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alan W. Richardson (2003). Conceiving, Experiencing, and Conceiving Experiencing: Neo-Kantianism and the History of the Concept of Experience. [REVIEW] Topoi 22 (1):55-67.
Szekely Lajos (1959). The Problem of Experience in the Gestalt Psychology. Theoria 25:179-186.
Evan Fales (1996). A Defense of the Given. Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield.
Matthew C. Haug (2011). On the Prospects for Ontology: Deflationism, Pluralism, and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):n/a-n/a.
Fiona Macpherson (2006). Ambiguous Figures and the Content of Experience. Noûs 40 (1):82-117.
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2003). The Justification of Concepts in Carnap's Aufbau. Philosophy of Science 70 (4):671-689.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1995). Does Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science Fill a Gap in the Critique of Pure Reason? Synthese 103 (1):43 - 86.
Steven Lehar (2003). The World in Your Head: A Gestalt View of the Mechanism of Conscious Experience. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Timothy Fuller (2009). Oakeshott on the Character of Religious Experience: Need There Be a Conflict Between Science and Religion? Zygon 44 (1):153-167.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #101,772 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,260 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?