Is the Continuum Hypothesis a definite mathematical problem?

Abstract The purpose of this article is to explain why I believe that the Continuum Hypothesis (CH) is not a definite mathematical problem. My reason for that is that the concept of arbitrary set essential to its formulation is vague or underdetermined and there is no way to sharpen it without violating what it is supposed to be about. In addition, there is considerable circumstantial evidence to support the view that CH is not definite
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,709
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries

    Similar books and articles
    Krzysztof Wójtowicz (2006). Independence and Justification in Mathematics. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):349-373.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-09-26

    Total downloads

    76 ( #10,629 of 549,592 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,397 of 549,592 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums