What's definite? What's not?
| Abstract | • Definite totalities are set-like. If definite totalities are sets then the totality of all sets is indefinite (Russell). | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesIan Pratt-Hartmann (2008). On the Computational Complexity of the Numerically Definite Syllogistic and Related Logics. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):1 - 28.
Almerindo E. Ojeda (1991). Definite Descriptions and Definite Generics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (4):367 - 397.
Berit Brogaard (2007). Sharvy's Theory of Definite Descriptions Revisited. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):160–180.
Keith S. Donnellan (1966). Reference and Definite Descriptions. Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-08-07Total downloads34 ( #35,279 of 548,999 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,999 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
