A note on justification and reconstruction
Philosophical Studies 9 (5-6):70 - 72 (1958)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLuciano Floridi (1994). The Problem of the Justification of a Theory of Knowledge. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 25 (1):17 - 49.
Shimon Edelman (1999). No Reconstruction, No Impenetrability (at Least Not Much). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):376-376.
Jonathan Kvanvig (2012). Coherentism and Justified Inconsistent Beliefs: A Solution. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):21-41.
Declan Smithies (2012). Moore's Paradox and the Accessibility of Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):273-300.
Herbert Feigl (1950). Logical Reconstruction, Realism and Pure Semiotic. Philosophy of Science 17 (2):186-195.
James S. Fishkin (1988). Bargaining, Justice, and Justification: Towards Reconstruction. Social Philosophy and Policy 5 (02):46-.
Nicholas Griffin (1972). A Note on Mr. Cooper's Reconstruction of Mill's "Proof". Mind 81 (321):142-143.
Gerhard Schurz (2001). Pietroski and Rey on Ceteris Paribus Laws. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):359Ð370.
Eveline T. Feteris (2008). The Rational Reconstruction of Weighing and Balancing on the Basis of Teleological-Evaluative Considerations in the Justification of Judicial Decisions. Ratio Juris 21 (4):481-495.
John Canfield & Keith Lehrer (1961). A Note on Prediction and Deduction. Philosophy of Science 28 (2):204-208.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,420 of 549,067 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,067 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
