Obscene words and the law
Law and Philosophy 2 (2):139 - 161 (1983)
| Abstract | This paper asks whether the criminal law can have any legitimate concern with obscene language. At most, such a concern could be justified by the need to protect auditors from offense, since it is not plausible to think of exposure to dirty words as harmful or inherently immoral. A distinction is drawn between bare utterance and instant offense, on the one hand, and offensive nuisance and harassment, on the other. Only when obscene language is used to harass can it properly be made criminal. Finally, I criticize in some detail judicial reasoning in the case of F.C.C. v. Pacifica Foundation, and conclude that obscene language on the public media is not properly subject to governmental regulation, whether- by criminal law or otherwise. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A9102008 00002. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDouglas Husak (2008). Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
R. A. Duff (2010). Towards a Theory of Criminal Law? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Michael T. Cahill (2009). Grading Arson. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):79-95.
Joel Feinberg (1984). The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
George P. Fletcher (2007). The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International. Oxford University Press.
David Shoemaker (2000). ''Dirty Words'' and the Offense Principle. Law and Philosophy 19 (5):545 - 584.
Mary Anne Franks (2003). Obscene Undersides: Women and Evil Between the Taliban and the United States. Hypatia 18 (1):135-156.
Larry Alexander (2006). L. W. Sumner, The Hateful and the Obscene:The Hateful and the Obscene. Ethics 116 (4):809-813.
Dennis J. Baker (2008). The Sense and Nonsense of Criminalizing Transfers of Obscene. Singapore Law Review 26:126-160.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads39 ( #29,866 of 549,510 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,510 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
