Wrongful Life and the Counterfactual Element in Harming

Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1):145 (1986)
I shall be concerned in this paper with some philosophical puzzles raised by so-called “wrongful life” suits. These legal actions are obviously of great interest to lawyers and physicians, but philosophers might have a kind of professional interest in them too, since in a remarkably large number of them, judges have complained that the issues are too abstruse for the courts and belong more properly to philosophers and theologians. The issues that elicit this judicial frustration are those that require the application to border-line cases of such philosophically interesting concepts as acting, causing, and the one that especially interests me, harming. I first became interested in the concept of harming in my work on the moral limits of the criminal law, where I had to come to terms with John Stuart Mill's famous “harm principle”–the principle that it is always a good reason in support of a criminal prohibition, indeed, the only legitimate reason, that it will prevent harm to persons other than the actor. I could not very well criticize that principle until I decided what the word “harm” must mean in its formulation. I gave what I took to be the requisite analysis of harm in my book Harm to Others. Here I wish to improve that analysis, examine its implications for civil as well as criminal liability, and test it on conceptually hard cases, especially cases of prenatal harming, that is, cases in which the wrongful causative conduct occurs before the victim's birth, and the harmed state that is its upshot consists in being born in an impaired condition
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052500000467
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,664
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Robert Sparrow (2015). Imposing Genetic Diversity. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (6):2-10.
Robert Sparrow (2011). A Not‐So‐New Eugenics. Hastings Center Report 41 (1):32-42.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Eric M. Cave (2009). Unsavory Seduction. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):235 - 245.
Barry M. Loewer (1985). What is Wrong with 'Wrongful Life' Cases? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):127-146.
Jakob Elster (2007). Wrongful Life, Suicide, and Euthanasia. Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):273-282.
A. N. Liu (1987). Wrongful Life: Some of the Problems. Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (2):69-73.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

236 ( #13,110 of 1,902,889 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

15 ( #54,432 of 1,902,889 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.