David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (1):51-70 (2000)
Critics of Hans-Georg Gadamer maintain that his philosophical hermeneutics is unduly conservative: supposedly, Gadamer too readily accepts tradition and too quickly assumes that a text has a unified and understandable meaning. Critics of Jacques Derrida, meanwhile, declare that deconstruction leads to nihilism: if the meaning of every text is undecidable, then a text can mean anything at all - no one meaning is better or worse than any other. And if there is no ground to stand upon, these critics add, then how can we normatively evaluate others? In this essay, I respond to the critics of both Gadamer and Derrida by arguing that philosophical hermeneutics and deconstruction should be understood as complementary postmodern philosophies, as mutually supportive descriptions of the hermeneutic situation. As such, deconstruction counters the charge that philosophical hermeneutics is conservative: instead, a Derridean view uncovers the radical political potential that resides within Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. Meanwhile, philosophical hermeneutics counters the charge that deconstruction is nihilistic and cannot support ethical or political critique. A Gadamerian view explains how deconstruction assumes the possibility of understanding meaning and maintaining values that can engender critique. Key Words: deconstruction • Derrida • Gadamer • hermeneutics • justice • philosophical hermeneutics • postmodernism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephen M. Feldman (2005). The Problem of Critique: Triangulating Habermas, Derrida, and Gadamer Within Metamodernism. Contemporary Political Theory 4 (3):296-320.
Similar books and articles
Veronica Vasterling (2003). Postmodern Hermeneutics? Towards a Critical Hermeneutics. In Lorraine Code (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Pennsylvania State University Press
Eftichis Pirovolakis (2010). Reading Derrida and Ricoeur: Improbable Encounters Between Deconstruction and Hermeneutics. State University of New York Press.
Flemming Lebech (2006). The Concept of the Subject in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (2):221 – 236.
Alan D. Schrift (1990). Nietzsche and the Question of Interpretation: Between Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. Routledge.
I. I. I. Mootz, Gadamer's Rhetorical Conception of Hermeneutics as the Key to Developing a Critical Hermeneutics.
Robert J. Dostal (2008). Gadamerian Hermeneutics and Irony: Between Strauss and Derrida. Research in Phenomenology 38 (2):247-269.
A. T. Nuyen (1994). Interpretation and Understanding in Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (4):426-438.
Adrian Costache (2011). On the Philosophical Styles of the Times: Some Questions Concerning the Meaning of Deconstruction. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):20-29.
Donatella Di Cesare (2004). Stars and Constellations: The Difference Between Gadamer and Derrida. Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):73-102.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #113,841 of 1,911,818 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,984 of 1,911,818 )
How can I increase my downloads?