The familiar and the strange: On the limits of praxis in the early Heidegger
Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (S1):23-41 (1990)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Richard Rorty (1999). Not All That Strange: A Response to Dreyfus and Spinosa. Inquiry 42 (1):125 – 128.
Iain Thomson (2007). On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Reading Heidegger Backwards: White's Time and Death. Inquiry 50 (1):103 – 120.
Iain Thomson (2004). Heidegger's Perfectionist Philosophy of Educationin Being and Time. Continental Philosophy Review 37 (4):439-467.
Dennis J. Schmidt (1990). “Strangers in the Dark: On the Limitations of the Limits Ofpraxisin the Early Heidegger”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (S1):43-49.
Jordana Dym (2004). The Familiar and the Strange: Western Travelers' Maps of Europe and Asia, Ca. 1600-1800. Philosophy and Geography 7 (2):155 – 191.
Frederic L. Bender (1984). Heidegger's Hermeneutical Grounding of Science. Philosophy Research Archives 10:203-238.
Tyson Koska (2003). Transiting the Familiar and the Strange. Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):117 – 122.
Daniel O. Dahlstrom (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Heidegger: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Terri Elliott (1994). Making Strange What Had Appeared Familiar. The Monist 77 (4):424-433.
Daniel O. Dahlstrom (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Bernasconi (1986). The Fate of the Distinction Between Praxis and Poiesis. Heidegger Studies 2:111-139.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-15Total downloads11 ( #100,810 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |

