Human Studies 31 (3):299 - 322 (2008)
|Abstract||The aim of my paper is twofold. First, I show how the notion of phenomenal field can be used to examine, describe and understand particular collective patterns pertaining to the everyday domain of our common social experience. Secondly, I outline the role of the notion of “phenomenal field” in ethnomethodology. I briefly discuss Gurwitsch’s notion of functional meaning. After presenting the argument, I show “the locally achieved ordinariness of a common task”, that is the lining up of the player of the two teams in the pitch, as an embodied coherence of figural contexture in its empirical perceptual details, as Garfinkel says.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Axel Seemann (2009). Why We Did It: An Anscombian Account of Collective Action. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (5):637-655.
Brian P. McLaughlin (2003). A Naturalist-Phenomenal Realist Response to Block's Harder Problem. Philosophical Issues 13 (1):163-204.
John M. DePoe (2011). Defeating the Self-Defeat Argument for Phenomenal Conservativism. Philosophical Studies 152 (3):347-359.
Steven Ravett Brown (1999). Beyond the Fringe: James, Gurwitsch, and the Conscious Horizon. Journal Of Mind And Behavior 20 (2):211-227.
Brian Loar (1990). Phenomenal States. Philosophical Perspectives 4:81-108.
Robert Schroer (2009). Does the Phenomenality of Perceptual Experience Present an Obstacle to Phenomenal Externalism? Philosophical Papers 39 (1):93-110.
Benj Hellie (2007). Factive Phenomenal Characters. Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):259--306.
Sandro Segre (2004). Ethnomethodology in Italy. Sociological Theory 22 (4):647-661.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #145,407 of 548,977 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,977 )
How can I increase my downloads?