Weak Spots in Business Ethics: A Psycho-Analytic Study of Competition and Memory in "Death of a Salesman"
Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):391 - 404 (2003)
|Abstract||The field of business ethics has shown little attention to the dynamics of memory in maintaining moral character. Yet memory is a complex process that involves the repression of some experiences in order to protect the moral integrity of the personality. Without the capacity to repress what one's moral conscience would not accept, the mind can be overtaken by neurotic ambivalence and moral confusion. In the context of business competition, where the pressures for potential gains and losses can be immense, long repressed desires can receive renewed strength resulting in a weakening of moral constraint. In this essay, I use the psycho-analytic theory of repression to investigate the complex, psychological vicissitudes of human memory. The theory of repression is a particularly powerful tool to investigate the moral implications of memory because memories which are repressed - i.e., forbidden consciousness - are done so at the behest of the individual's moral ideals. Experiences that offend these ideals or threaten the integrity of the ego can be repressed. Repression, then, is an infallible index of moral judgement. I will apply the theory of repression to the characters in and story line of Arthur Miller's play "Death of a Salesman" to elucidate the relationship between memory and ethics in business. "Death of a Salesman" is well suited for this purpose because the memories of the main characters are central to the play and are inextricably linked to the moral challenge competition in business poses.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey Blustein (2008). The Moral Demands of Memory. Cambridge University Press.
Steven P. Feldman (2004). The Professional Conscience: A Psychoanalytic Study of Moral Character in Tolstoy's the Death of Ivan Ilych. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (4):311-328.
Matthew Hugh Erdelyi (2006). The Return of the Repressed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):535-543.
David H. Gleaves (2006). Dialectical Repression Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):520-521.
Steven M. Smith (2006). Resolving Repression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):534-535.
Nick Medford & Anthony S. David (2006). Learning From Repression: Emotional Memory and Emotional Numbing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):527-528.
T. A. Hemphill (2004). Antitrust, Dynamic Competition, and Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (2):127-135.
Richard B. Miller (2009). The Moral and Political Burdens of Memory. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (3):533-564.
Steven P. Feldman (2007). Moral Memory: Why and How Moral Companies Manage Tradition. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (4):395 - 409.
Joseph A. Petrick & John F. Quinn (2000). The Integrity Capacity Construct and Moral Progress in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (1):3 - 18.
George A. Bonanno (2006). The Illusion of Repressed Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):515-516.
Richard H. Toenjes (2002). Why Be Moral in Business? A Rawlsian Approach to Moral Motivation. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (1):57-72.
Einar Marnburg (2001). The Questionable Use of Moral Development Theory in Studies of Business Ethics: Discussion and Empirical Findings. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4):275 - 283.
Peter E. Mudrack (2003). The Untapped Relevance of Moral Development Theory in the Study of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (3):225 - 236.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads9 ( #113,901 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?