David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (2):86-92 (1998)
"Best interests" is widely accepted as the appropriate foundation principle for medico-legal decisions concerning treatment withdrawal from patients in persistent vegetative state (PVS). Its application appears to progress logically from earlier use regarding legally incompetent patients. This author argues, however, that such confidence in the relevance of the principle of best interests to PVS is misplaced, and that current construction in this context is questionable on four specific grounds. Furthermore, it is argued that the resulting legal inconsistency is distorting both the principle itself and, more particularly, individual patient interests
|Keywords||info:mesh/Persistent Vegetative State info:mesh/Decision Making info:mesh/Withholding Treatment Humans Persistent Vegetative State Euthanasia, Active Withholding Treatment Risk Assessment Intention Decision Making Resource Allocation Judicial Role Patient Advocacy Ethics, Medical info:mesh/Judicial Role info:mesh/Patient Advocacy info:mesh/Euthanasia, Active info:mesh/Humans info:mesh/Ethics, Medical info:mesh/Intention info:mesh/Risk Assessment info:mesh/Resource Allocation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dominic Wilkinson, Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu (2008). “Neglected Personhood” and Neglected Questions: Remarks on the Moral Significance of Consciousness. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (9):31 – 33.
Similar books and articles
A. J. Fenwick (1999). Best Interests in Persistent Vegetative State. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (1):59-60.
Jim Stone (2007). Pascal's Wager and the Persistent Vegetative State. Bioethics 21 (2):84–92.
J. A. Stewart (1998). Best Interests and Persistent Vegetative State. Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):350-350.
R. Gillon (1998). Persistent Vegetative State, Withdrawal of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration, and the Patient's "Best Interests". Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (2):75-76.
Jukka Varelius (2013). Pascal's Wager and Deciding About the Life-Sustaining Treatment of Patients in Persistent Vegetative State. Neuroethics 6 (2):277-285.
Thomas A. Mappes (2003). Persistent Vegetative State, Prospective Thinking, and Advance Directives. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):119-139.
Charles Weijer, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Patients in a Persistent Vegetative State: Futile or Acceptable?
R. Gillon (1993). Persistent Vegetative State and Withdrawal of Nutrition and Hydration. Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (2):67-68.
Gastone G. Celesia (1997). Persistent Vegetative State: Clinical and Ethical Issues. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (3).
A. Treloar (2000). Japanese Physicians and the Care of Adult Patients in Persistent Vegetative State. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):142-142.
O'Rourke O. Kevin (2006). Reflections on the Papal Allocution Concerning Care for Persistent Vegetative State Patients. Christian Bioethics 12 (1):83-97.
Daniel Wikler (1988). Not Dead, Not Dying: Ethical Categories And Persistent Vegetative State. Hastings Center Report 18 (February-March):41-47.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2002). Vegetative State – The Untold Story. New Law Journal 152:1272.
S. J. Rev Peter Clark (2006). Tube Feedings and Persistent Vegetative State Patients: Ordinary or Extraordinary Means? Christian Bioethics 12 (1):43-64.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads12 ( #205,927 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?