International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):51-61 (1998)
|Abstract||This paper argues that due to considerations of proximity of particular humans to particular (nonhuman) animals, and to the impact this proximity has on the obligations felt by those humans to those animals, an animal rights strategy as a means of specifying what obligations humans really do have toward animals cannot be successful. The good news, however; is that it is out of these proximity relations that we can begin to understand just what obligations humans properly do have toward animals|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joel Marks (2010). Live Free or Die. [REVIEW] Animal Law 17 (1):243-250.
Tom L. Beauchamp (1997). Opposing Views on Animal Experimentation: Do Animals Have Rights? Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121.
Kelly Oliver (2010). Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness. Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Cary Wolfe (2013). Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame. The University of Chicago Press.
David Sztybel (2001). Animal Rights: Autonomy and Redundancy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.
Mark Rowlands (2009). Animal Rights: Moral Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kay Peggs (2012). Animals and Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan.
David DeGrazia (2002). Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Angus Taylor (1996). Animal Rights and Human Needs. Environmental Ethics 18 (3):249-264.
Donna Yarri (2005). The Ethics of Animal Experimentation: A Critical Analysis and Constructive Christian Proposal. OUP USA.
Claire Molloy (2011). Popular Media and Animals. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #145,673 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?