David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Teaching Philosophy 25 (3):227-236 (2002)
Drawing upon Jonathan Bennett’s article “The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn,” a work which claims to show the role that emotions play in moral argument, this paper more closely considers the contextual clues of "Huck Finn" to determine the moral commitments that truly guide Huck’s thinking about moral principles. In opposition to Bennett’s reading of Twain, the paper argues that it is Huck’s application of his morality that is bad, and so his moral behavior cannot be explained by acting purely out of sympathy. In addition, to arguing for this alternative reading of Twain’s work, the paper points out how Huck’s reasoning about moral principles can be used to fend off ethical nihilism and is analogous to Galileo’s thought experiment concerning motion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anders Schinkel (2011). Huck Finn, Moral Language and Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):511-525.
Chad Kleist (2009). Huck Finn the Inverse Akratic: Empathy and Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):257 - 266.
Jung H. Lee (2009). The Moral Power of Jim: A Mencian Reading of Huckleberry Finn. Asian Philosophy 19 (2):101 – 118.
Craig Taylor (2012). Huck Finn, Moral Reasons and Sympathy. Philosophy 87 (04):583-593.
James Montmarquet (2012). Huck Finn, Aristotle, and Anti-Intellectualism in Moral Psychology. Philosophy 87 (01):51-63.
Carol Freedman (1997). The Morality of Huck Finn. Philosophy and Literature 21 (1):102-113.
Phillip Montague (1980). Re-Examining Huck Finn's Conscience. Philosophy 55 (214):542 - 546.
Donovan Miyasaki (2007). Against the Moral Appraisal of Art: Wayne Booth and the Case of Huck Finn. Philosophy and Literature 31 (1):125-32.
Mark van Roojen (2010). Moral Rationalism and Rational Amoralism. Ethics 120 (3):495–525.
Bernard G. Prusak (2011). When Words Fail Us: Reexamining the Conscience of Huckleberry Finn. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):1-22.
Russell Hanford & John R. Snarey (2001). Parenting Huckleberry Finn. Journal of Moral Education 30 (3):293-297.
Craig Taylor (2001). Moral Incapacity and Huckleberry Finn. Ratio 14 (1):56–67.
Tracy Finn (2011). Conscience: What is Moral Intuition? In Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Morality and the Emotions. Oxford University Press
Alan Goldman (2010). Huckleberry Finn and Moral Motivation. Philosophy and Literature 34 (1):pp. 1-16.
John J. Tilley (2008). Reasons, Rational Requirements, and the Putative Pseudo-Question “Why Be Moral?”. Synthese 161 (2):309 - 323.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads10 ( #228,082 of 1,725,630 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #134,602 of 1,725,630 )
How can I increase my downloads?