David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Tradition and Discovery 37 (1):6-18 (2010)
Michael Polanyi articulates two arguments against the view that moral judgment has no proper place in the conduct of political science: Non-judgmental political science cannot understand what it studies; and non-judgmental political science cannot understand the political scientist himself. Evaluation of these arguments not only clarifies important dimensions of Polanyi’s conceptions of understanding and tacit inference, it prompts a reconsideration of the nature of both moral deliberation and moral truth. The encounter with Polanyi demonstrates that non-judgmental political science does indeed fall short of its stated objective.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Polanyi (2004). Michael Polanyi, The Scientist. Tradition and Discovery 31 (1):7-10.
Gerald Holton (1992). Michael Polanyi and the History of Science. Tradition and Discovery 19 (1):16-30.
Richard Gelwick (1995). The Polanyi-Tillich Dialogue Of 1963. Tradition and Discovery 22 (1):11-19.
Ronald L. Hall (1997). The Primacy Of The Explicit. Tradition and Discovery 24 (2):29-39.
I. C. Jarvie (2001). Science in a Democratic Republic. Philosophy of Science 68 (4):545-564.
Frank H. Knight (1949). Virtue and Knowledge: The View of Professor Polanyi:Science, Faith and Society. Michael Polanyi; The Foundations of Academic Freedom. Michael Polanyi. Ethics 59 (4):271-.
Struan Jacobs (2002). Polanyi's Presagement of the Incommensurability Concept. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):101-116.
Richard Gelwick (1982). Science and Reality, Religion and God: A Reply to Harry Prosch. Zygon 17 (1):25-40.
Michael Hagner (2012). Perception, Knowledge and Freedom in the Age of Extremes: On the Historical Epistemology of Ludwik Fleck and Michael Polanyi. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):107-120.
David W. Rutledge (1998). “Beyond Logic and Beneath Will”. Tradition and Discovery 25 (2):20-29.
Mary Jo Nye (2011). Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science. The University of Chicago Press.
Martin X. Moleski (2006). Polanyi Vs. Kuhn. Tradition and Discovery 33 (2):8-24.
Ronald L. Hall (1982). Michael Polanyi on Art and Religion: Some Critical Reflections on Meaning. Zygon 17 (1):9-18.
Richard Henry Schmitt (2006). Darwin, Kuhn, and Polanyi. Tradition and Discovery 33 (2):49-55.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads66 ( #61,255 of 1,790,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #54,689 of 1,790,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?