David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:239-252 (2010)
Plato’s dialogues are self-defined as works of mimetic art, and the ancients clearly consider mimesis as working naturally before reason and beneath it. Such aview connects with two contemporary ideas—Rene Girard’s idea of the mimetic basis of culture and neurophysiological research into mirror neurons. Individualityarises out of, and can collapse back into our mimetic origin. This para-rational notion of mimesis as that in which and by which all our knowledge is framed requires we not only concern ourselves with Socrates’s arguments and distinctions, but also see how the dramatic interaction of the characters is working (or not) on/in the characters, and consider how watching the interaction, hearing the parables and myths, and thinking through the arguments and interactions is meant to effect us. That Plato creates mimeses means he aims at passional conversion not merely argumentative worth, since mimesis aims to (and does) work on the passions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wolfgang Palaver (2013). René Girard's Mimetic Theory. Michigan State University Press.
Paisley Livingston (1994). What is Mimetic Desire? Philosophical Psychology 7 (3):291 – 305.
Sherwood Belangia (2011). Metaphysical Desire in Girard and Plato. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):197-209.
Tom Huhn (1996). The Movement of Mimesis: Heidegger's 'Origin of the Work of Art' in Relation to Adorno and Lyotard. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (4):45-69.
Paolo Diego Bubbio (2008). Review of Chris Fleming, Rene Girard: Violence and Mimesis. [REVIEW] Australian Religious Studies Review 21 (1):96-97.
Joseph Weiss (2009). Transforming Mimetic Play. Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):273-287.
Paolo Diego Bubbio (2007). Literary Aesthetics and Knowledge in René Girard’s Mimetic Theory. Literature and Aesthetics 17 (1):35-50.
Jordan Zlatev, Tomas Persson & Peter Gärdenfors (2005). Triadic Bodily Mimesis is the Difference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):720-721.
Anthony Holiday (1998). Prohibited Pictures: Political Education and Platonic Elitism. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (4):243-250.
J. Angelo Corlett (2005). Interpreting Plato's Dialogues. Parmenides Pub..
William Blake Tyrrell (2012). The Sacrifice of Socrates: Athens, Plato, Girard. Michigan State University Press.
Atsuko Tsuji (2010). Experience in the Very Moment of Writing: Reconsidering Walter Benjamin's Theory of Mimesis. Journal of Philosophy of Education 44 (1):125-136.
Russell Winslow (2012). On Mimetic Style in Plato's Republic. Philosophy and Rhetoric 45 (1):46-64.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads18 ( #87,722 of 1,096,425 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #87,121 of 1,096,425 )
How can I increase my downloads?