“The Meaning of 'Meaning is Normative' ”

Philosophical Investigations 36 (1):56-78 (2013)
Abstract
This paper defends the thesis that meaning is intrinsically normative. Recent anti-normativist objectors have distinguished two versions of the thesis – correctness and prescriptivity – and have attacked both. In the first two sections, I defend the thesis against each of these attacks; in the third section, I address two further, closely related, anti-normativist arguments against the normativity thesis and, in the process, clarify its sense by distinguishing a universalist and a contextualist reading of it. I argue that the anti-normativist position is successful only against the universalist reading but point out that normativists do not require this reading of the thesis; the contextualist one is both possible and desirable for them. Furthermore, I argue that anti-normativists require the contextualist reading of the normativity thesis to make their case, as well as to avoid meaning relativism. In the final two sections of the paper, I explain how a contextualist understanding of the normativity thesis is compatible with Quine's elimination of analyticity, thus undermining a key underlying reason for anti-normativism, and I respond to the objection that a contextualist reading of the normativity thesis is either self-contradictory or else trivial
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Akeel Bilgrami (1998). Replies. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (3):635-647.

    View all 17 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Hannah Ginsborg (2012). Meaning, Understanding and Normativity. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):127-146.
    John Fennell (2003). The Three Quines. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (3):261 – 292.
    Nenad Smokrović (2002). Semantic Naturalism and Normativity. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):71-81.
    Anandi Hattiangadi (2006). Is Meaning Normative? Mind and Language 21 (2):220-240.
    D. Pritchard (2002). Two Forms of Epistemological Contextualism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):19-55.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-02-27

    Total downloads

    58 ( #22,316 of 1,089,057 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #30,944 of 1,089,057 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.