The relation of monologion and proslogion
Heythrop Journal 46 (2):149–166 (2005)
| Abstract | This paper argues that Monologion and Proslogion though distinguishable are not really separable. They are distinct as "the way in" and "the way when one is in" but "the way in" reveals itself as a discovery of already being in; thus these ways are distinct in act, but not in being. Monologion moves from imaginary ignorance to real reverence, while Proslogion begins within reverence to achieve understanding. | |||||||||
| Keywords | ontological argument Augustinianism Monologion Proslogion Anselm meditation degrees of justice | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGary Mar (1996). The Modal Unity of Anselm's Proslogion. Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):50-67.
Gary Mar (1996). The Modal Unity of Anselm's Proslogion. Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):50-67.
Ian Logan (2008). Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
F. B. A. Asiedu (2002). The Elusive Face of Modern Platonism. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):393-410.
Sandra Visser (2009). Anselm. Oxford University Press.
Gregory B. Sadler (2006). Mercy and Justice in St. Anselm's Proslogion. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):41-61.
Anselm (1900). Anselm of Canterbury. Edwin Mellen Press.
Nancy Kendrick (2011). The Non-Christian Influence on Anselm's Proslogion Argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):73-89.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,255 of 549,671 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
