Journal of Semantics 25 (3):321-344 (2008)
|Abstract||The notion of inertia is explicated in terms of forces recorded in snapshots that are strung together to represent events. The role inertia worlds were conceived to serve in the semantics of the progressive is assumed by a branching construct that specifies what may follow, apart from what follows|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jiri Benovsky (2005). Branching Versus Divergent Possible Worlds. Kriterion 19:12-20.
Simon Saunders & D. Wallace (2008). Branching and Uncertainty. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):293-305.
Alastair Wilson (2012). Everettian Quantum Mechanics Without Branching Time. Synthese 188 (1):67-84.
Olga Kagan (2011). The Actual World is Abnormal: On the Semantics of the Bylo Construction in Russian. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):57-84.
Franz Von Kutschera (1993). Causation. Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (6):563 - 588.
Carolina Sartorio (2008). Moral Inertia. Philosophical Studies 140 (1):117 - 133.
Thomas J. McLaughlin (2008). Nature and Inertia. The Review of Metaphysics 62 (2):251-284.
Alberto Zanardo (2006). Quantification Over Sets of Possible Worlds in Branching-Time Semantics. Studia Logica 82 (3):379 - 400.
Philip Percival (2013). Branching of Possible Worlds. Synthese 190 (18):4261-4291.
Thomas Müller (2012). Branching in the Landscape of Possibilities. Synthese 188 (1):41-65.
Beryl E. Clotfelter (1970). Reference Systems and Inertia. Ames,Iowa State University Press.
Eugene Mills (1991). Forbes's Branching Conception of Possible Worlds. Analysis 51 (1):48 - 50.
Edward Feser (2011). Existential Inertia and the Five Ways. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2):237-267.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-02
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?