Developments in the debate on nanoethics: Traditional approaches and the need for new kinds of analysis
Nanoethics 4 (1):27-52 (2010)
| Abstract | This paper aims to review different discourses within the emerging field of ethical reflection on nanotechnology. I will start by analysing the early stages of this debate, showing how it has been focused on searching for legitimacy for this sphere of moral inquiry. I will then characterise an ethical approach, common to many authors, which frames ethical issues in terms of risks and benefits. This approach identifies normative issues where there are conflicts of interest or where challenges to the fundamental values of our society arise. In response to the limitations of this approach, other commentators have called for more profound analysis of the limits of our knowledge, and have appealed to values, such as sustainability or responsibility, which should, they suggest, inform nanotechnological development (I will define this approach as a “sophisticated form of prudence”). After showing the ways in which these frameworks are limited, I will examine more recent developments in debates on nanoethics which call for the contextualisation of ethical discourse in its ontological, epistemic and socio-economic and political reflections. Such contextualisation thus involves inquiry into the ‘metaphysical research program’ (MRP) of nanotechnology/ies and analysis of the socio-economic, political and historical reality of nano. These ideas offer genuinely new insights into the kind of approach required for nanoethical reflection: they recover a sense of the present alongside the need to engage with the past, while avoiding speculation on the future. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesArmin Grunwald (2010). From Speculative Nanoethics to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 4 (2):91-101.
Robert E. McGinn (2010). What's Different, Ethically, About Nanotechnology?: Foundational Questions and Answers. Nanoethics 4 (2):115-128.
Philip Brey (forthcoming). Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies. Nanoethics (Browse Results).
Alfred Nordmann (2010). Beyond Conversation: Some Lessons for Nanoethics. Nanoethics 4 (2):171-181.
Sheri Alpert (2008). Neuroethics and Nanoethics: Do We Risk Ethical Myopia? Neuroethics 1 (1).
Deborah G. Johnson (2007). Ethics and Technology 'in the Making': An Essay on the Challenge of Nanoethics. NanoEthics 1 (1).
Fritz Allhoff (2007). On the Autonomy and Justification of Nanoethics. NanoEthics 1 (3).
Arianna Ferrari & Alfred Nordmann (2010). Beyond Conversation: Some Lessons for Nanoethics. Nanoethics 4 (2):171-181.
Ibo van de Poel (2008). How Should We Do Nanoethics? A Network Approach for Discerning Ethical Issues in Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2 (1).
Armin Grunwald (2005). Nanotechnology — a New Field of Ethical Inquiry? Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):187-201.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-01-27Total downloads39 ( #29,813 of 549,090 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,090 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
