Sustainable development: Lost meaning and opportunity? [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 60 (1):17 - 27 (2005)
The term Sustainable Development has been used in many different contexts and consequently has come to represent many different ideas. The purpose of this paper was to explore the underlying meaning of the term Sustainable Development, and to assess the dominant ethic behind such meaning. Through this exploration, we uncovered a change in the semantic meaning of the term, and described what that meaning entails. The term Sustainable Development had the potential, we argue, to stimulate discursive engagement with respect to the future development of society within an ethical framework based around the values of inclusivity, diversity, and integration. The importance of philosophical context within which the term is used influences the definitional process of meaning, and has been simulated into the language of the dominant scientific-economic paradigm. We go on to explore how this meaning change has come about. In doing so we looked to the Enlightenment period and the resulting philosophies to explore the foundations of meaning, and then to the work of Jürgen Habermas to explain how the scientific-economic paradigm came to dominate the meaning of Sustainable Development.
|Keywords||Sustainable Development Scientific-economic paradigm philosophy Habermas Values Relationships|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jürgen Habermas (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, 'Reason and the Rationalization of Society'. Polity..
Tony Lawson (1997). Economics and Reality. Routledge.
Jürgen Habermas (1985). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Itziar Castelló & Josep M. Lozano (2011). Searching for New Forms of Legitimacy Through Corporate Responsibility Rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics 100 (1):11 - 29.
Claudia Som, Lorenz M. Hilty & Andreas R. Köhler (2009). The Precautionary Principle as a Framework for a Sustainable Information Society. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):493 - 505.
Mert Bilgin (2009). The PEARL Model: Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Sustainable Development. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):545 - 554.
David Finch, David Deephouse & Paul Varella (2015). Examining an Individual’s Legitimacy Judgment Using the Value–Attitude System: The Role of Environmental and Economic Values and Source Credibility. Journal of Business Ethics 127 (2):265-281.
Frank Birkin & Thomas Polesie (2011). An Epistemic Analysis of (Un)Sustainable Business. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):239-253.
Similar books and articles
Mario Giampietro & Sandra G. F. Bukkens (1992). Sustainable Development: Scientific and Ethical Assessments. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1):27-57.
Paul Lansing & Paul De Vries (2007). Sustainable Tourism: Ethical Alternative or Marketing Ploy? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (1):77 - 85.
W. Mckinney (2000). Of Sustainability and Precaution The Logical, Epistemological, and Moral Problems of the Precautionary Principle and Their Implications for Sustainable Development. Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):77-87.
Ned Block (1995). Ruritania Revisited. Philosophical Issues 6:171-187.
Asterios G. Kefalas (2001). The Environmentally Sustainable Organization (ESO): A Systems Approach. Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):90-105.
Joseph R. Herkert (1998). Sustainable Development, Engineering and Multinational Corporations: Ethical and Public Policy Implications. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):333-346.
Robin Attfield (2007). Sustainable Development Revisited. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:185-189.
M. Haque (2000). Environmental Discourse and Sustainable Development Linkages and Limitations. Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):3-21.
Joanna Becker (2007). How Frameworks Can Help Operationalize Sustainable Development Indicators. World Futures 63 (2):137 – 150.
Andrew H. T. Fergus & Julie I. A. Rowney (2005). Sustainable Development: Epistemological Frameworks & an Ethic of Choice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):197 - 207.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #68,722 of 1,790,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #167,785 of 1,790,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?