Sustainable development: Lost meaning and opportunity?
Journal of Business Ethics 60 (1):17 - 27 (2005)
| Abstract | The term Sustainable Development has been used in many different contexts and consequently has come to represent many different ideas. The purpose of this paper was to explore the underlying meaning of the term Sustainable Development, and to assess the dominant ethic behind such meaning. Through this exploration, we uncovered a change in the semantic meaning of the term, and described what that meaning entails. The term Sustainable Development had the potential, we argue, to stimulate discursive engagement with respect to the future development of society within an ethical framework based around the values of inclusivity, diversity, and integration. The importance of philosophical context within which the term is used influences the definitional process of meaning, and has been simulated into the language of the dominant scientific-economic paradigm. We go on to explore how this meaning change has come about. In doing so we looked to the Enlightenment period and the resulting philosophies to explore the foundations of meaning, and then to the work of Jürgen Habermas to explain how the scientific-economic paradigm came to dominate the meaning of Sustainable Development. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMario Giampietro & Sandra G. F. Bukkens (1992). Sustainable Development: Scientific and Ethical Assessments. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1).
Paul Lansing & Paul De Vries (2007). Sustainable Tourism: Ethical Alternative or Marketing Ploy? Journal of Business Ethics 72 (1):77 - 85.
W. Mckinney (2000). Of Sustainability and Precaution The Logical, Epistemological, and Moral Problems of the Precautionary Principle and Their Implications for Sustainable Development. Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):77-87.
Ned Block (1995). Ruritania Revisited. Philosophical Issues 6:171-187.
Asterios G. Kefalas (2001). The Environmentally Sustainable Organization (ESO): A Systems Approach. Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):90-105.
Joseph R. Herkert (1998). Sustainable Development, Engineering and Multinational Corporations: Ethical and Public Policy Implications. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):333-346.
Robin Attfield (2007). Sustainable Development Revisited. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:185-189.
M. Haque (2000). Environmental Discourse and Sustainable Development Linkages and Limitations. Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):3-21.
Joanna Becker (2007). How Frameworks Can Help Operationalize Sustainable Development Indicators. World Futures 63 (2):137 – 150.
Andrew H. T. Fergus & Julie I. A. Rowney (2005). Sustainable Development: Epistemological Frameworks & an Ethic of Choice. Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):197 - 207.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads31 ( #40,051 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #16,099 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
