David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 7 (1-2):473-498 (1992)
Dedekind used to refer to Riemann as his main model concerning mathematical methodology, particularly regarding the use of abstract notions as a basis for mathematical theories. So, in passages written in 1876 and 1895 he compared his approach to ideal theory with Riemann’s theory of complex functions. In this paper, I try to make sense of those declarations, showing the role of abstract notions in Riemann’s function theory, its influence on Dedekind, and the importance of the methodological principle of avoiding ‘forms of representation’ in shaping ideal theory. In order to emphasize the abstract viewpoint of Riemann and Dedekind, I compare their work with that of their great german contemporaries, Weierstrass and Kronecker; so, an influential ‘Göttingen group’ is confronted with the ‘Berlin school’ of mathematics. Some light is also thrown on the relation between Riemann and Dedekind, particularly with respect to Dedekind’s interest on Riemann’s ideas --in function theory, geometry and topology--, beginning in the 1850s and through later works. The abstract approach of the ‘Göttingen group’ was determinant for the turn to abstract mathematics in our century, and the direct influence of Riemann on Dedekind shows how this approach developed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
José Ferreiros Domínguez (1992). Sobre los orígenes de la Matemática abstracta. Theoria 7 (1/2/3):473-498.
Werner Ehm (2010). Broad Views of the Philosophy of Nature: Riemann, Herbart, and the “Matter of the Mind”. Philosophical Psychology 23 (2):141 – 162.
George Weaver (2003). The First-Order Theories of Dedekind Algebras. Studia Logica 73 (3):337 - 365.
William Bragg Ewald (2005). From Kant to Hilbert Volume 1: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. OUP Oxford.
William Bragg Ewald (ed.) (1996). From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
George Weaver (2011). A General Setting for Dedekind's Axiomatization of the Positive Integers. History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (4):375-398.
Anand Pillay & Charles Steinhorn (1987). On Dedekind Complete o-Minimal Structures. Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):156-164.
Erich H. Reck (2003). Dedekind's Structuralism: An Interpretation and Partial Defense. Synthese 137 (3):369 - 419.
George Weaver (2000). Homogeneous and Universal Dedekind Algebras. Studia Logica 64 (2):173-192.
José Ferreirós (2009). Hilbert, Logicism, and Mathematical Existence. Synthese 170 (1):33 - 70.
Erich H. Reck (2013). Frege or Dedekind? Towards a Reevalaution of Their Legacies. In , The Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Erich H. Reck (2009). Dedekind, Structural Reasoning, and Mathematical Understanding. In Bart Van Kerkhove (ed.), New Perspectives on Mathematical Practices: Essays in Philosophy and History of Mathematics. World Scientific. 150--173.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads2 ( #354,406 of 1,102,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #182,775 of 1,102,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?